In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
The traffic issues are caused by the incremental number of private vehicles. Some critics claim that, the government should impose taxes on private cars to solve the traffic issues. This essay will discuss benefits and drawbacks on imposing taxes on private cars before reasonable conclusion is reached.
The government could accumulate of lump sum of money from taxes to improve societies. Even though, the government imposes a tax on private cars in terms of Goods and Services Tax (GST), Capital Gain Tax (CGT), Stamp Duty or Green tax, the demand for purchasing vehicles would remain same. As a result, the government could gather huge amount of tax. With those monies, the government could improve society by providing subsidies for manufacturing companies. For example, the government could encourage companies to use natural gases instead of use of fossil gases. Therefore, the environment will be clean by decreasing the amount of pollution from vehicles. While the government could improve societies by collecting taxes from individuals, the burden for individuals would not be wiped out.
The consequences, of the government imposes taxes on personal vehicles, would bringing the potential economic downturn. They would still purchase cars even though individuals would face a huge burden of vehicle taxes. The higher prices for vehicles would be derived from huge taxes; as a result, individuals would seek for more employment. The demand for employment would increase due to higher price cars whereas the supply for employment remains same. Depression in economic growth would derive from higher demand and lower supplies for the employment. As a result, the traffic issues would be remained as a debatable issue.
Even though a potential economic downturn occurs due to the higher taxes on private vehicles, the taxes would directly impact on environment and solve traffic. Therefore, I put more weigh on advantage than disadvantages.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-11-08 | Jenny213987 | 78 | view |
2019-08-21 | siva Pra | 56 | view |
2019-08-21 | siva Pra | 56 | view |
2019-06-03 | dkklinkkk | 56 | view |
2019-06-03 | hangduan94@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 67
- Advertising is all around us, it is an unavoidable part of everyone's life. Some people say that advertising is a positive part of our lives while others say it is a negative one. Discuss both views and include your own opinion. 70
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia 79
- In many countries people are concerned about the number of children who are overweight What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 65
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 60
The consequences, of the government imposes taxes on personal vehicles, would bringing the potential economic downturn.
Description: can you re-write this sentence? a lot of errors
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 145 200
You didn't argue 'should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.'
---------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 304 350
No. of Characters: 1602 1500
No. of Different Words: 145 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.176 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.27 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.674 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 91 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.889 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.685 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.363 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.556 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.143 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5