Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life. Is it a positive or negative development?
Recent decades have witnessed the mounting ubiquity of advertising in human life. While some people claim that advertisements should be encouraged, I am of the opinion that this phenomenon could have numerous negative influences on the customer.
On the other hand, there are certain rationales why some people think that the increasing popularity of advertising is beneficial to the national economy and community. One of the most fundamental reasons is that advertisement paves the way for corporate bodies to promote their products’ information to the existing and potential customer base. Indeed, through compelling commercials appearing on commercial channels and social media sites, purchasers could have more diverse purchase choices, which proportionally lead to better customer purchase decisions and the enterprises’ spiraling profit. Another reason is that advertisements can serve prodigious employment opportunities. No doubt, the blossoming advertising industry provides occupations for artists, designers, and copywriters in designing and preparing content for the advertisement.
On the other hand, I do believe that advertising could exert erosive impacts on consumers. Firstly, companies can exaggerate the utility of minor features of their products for commercial purposes. As a result, customers could be lured to buy products whose quality is of inferiority in proportion to their price, which might trigger customers’ deteriorated reliability and loyalty. Secondly, this phenomenon can be detrimental to consumers’ health in the long term. For example, if young minds are exposed to the frequency of commercials for junk food, they might have the tendency to excessively consume this low-nutrient food, which can cause the mounting rate of childhood obesity.
In conclusion, while the ubiquity of advertisements can raise the revenue for corporations and generate employment opportunities, I espouse the notion that this phenomenon could have numerous disadvantages towards customers concerning their declining reliability and their physical health deterioration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-24 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-18 | MEBC Class | 80 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | MEBC Class | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06711409396 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31453945429 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3731988924 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.076923077 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0953692666062 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366296296612 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312655497165 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635783944826 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441760870658 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06711409396 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31453945429 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3731988924 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.076923077 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0953692666062 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366296296612 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312655497165 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635783944826 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441760870658 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.