After graduation many students take a year to travel. Some think that it would be more useful to work for a year.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some students who have just graduated from their high shools think that they should consume a gap year to travel. On the other side, other students believe that it will be more beneficial if they work for a year before studying at university or college. In my experience, it is equally beneficial to travel to other countries or work in a gap year.
Admittedly, travelling a year after graduation can bring numerous benefits such as boardening people’s horizons, having some quality experiences, and exploring themselves beofore an important choice of the life. In a year, for example, taking some tours to refresh people’s mind before some new things is an excellent way to prepare their mentality. After graduation, therfore, students want to have some new experiences. Hence, they travel the entire world. Absolutely, after they spend their time travelling, they not only boarden their horizons but they can also understand themselves. As a results, they can decide some influential and important choices such as keeping studying at university or college, or starting working and stopping studying. It is saving time for students.
Moreover, it is clear that people can acquire many things such as self-development skills, self-management skills, and money. When students decide working instead of travelling to other countries in their gap year, they obviously can earn money from work. Throughout their working time, moreover, they can learn some self-management skills such as saving their money and scheduling their day. Furthermore, after a long time working, they can develop themselves by learning some high-ranking people or their managers in their workplace. They, thus, might have quantity experiences to decide their important choices in their entire lifetime such as using money to keep studying at university or college or keeping working and stopping studying, or working and studying at the same time.
To sum up, after graduation, I believe that taking a year to travel or work brings students some positive effects. If they choose either traveling or working, they have equal benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-21 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 81 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 82 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 77 | view |
- Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne units 2005 Present 2025 Hamburgers 40 38 51 Fried Chicken 35 37 45 Salads 5 15 41 Fried Rice 6 9 9 Noodles 6 8 9 85
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 56
- Governments should spend more money on medical research and less on researching the environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 592, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...they can also understand themselves. As a results, they can decide some influential and i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34834834835 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86795119606 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.572251765 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.764705882 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260716149102 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107478548248 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076123039901 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204496863257 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638601890989 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.