The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that the only way to improve the safety on streets is providing much stricter punishments for drivers. In my opinion, I completely disagree that it is not the only way to improve the driving safety, there are some effective ways to improve the safety.
Regarding infrastructure and society, not only should governments develop the infrastructural systems to improve the driving safety, but they also provide some strict regalutions to decline violations while drivers are operating their vehicles. If some traffic regulations are strict, drivers are difficult to make a violation, such as driving through the red light. Moreover, in some metropolises, more police stations should be created to control and manage the traffic. It is obvious that governments can provide more police stations, more traffic violations will decline. Therefore, the number of accidents might decline, and driving on streets are safer.
Furthermore, regarding individuals, people should pay their attention on their operations. If their operations are effective, it is absolute that the number of accidents will fall down. Therefore, streets are much safer to drive. Moreover, people should control the speed while they are operating their vehicles. For example, if humans drive their vehicles with a speed, which is higher than the maximum speed, they cannot effectively control their vehicles when the accident circumstance happen. People, thus, make a crash on their roads. Therefore, people should drive their vehicles with the slow-driving to make roads much safer.
To sum up, I believe that providing much stricter punishments for drivers is not the only method to improve the safety on streets, some effective ways should be the cooperation between governments and individuals. Governments provide some regulations and individuals should be proactive to create more safe streets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-12 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 67 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced Summarise the important information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 61
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people believe that it is more important to teach children the literature and history of their own country rather than the literature and history of other countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57638888889 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87456384239 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482638888889 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9814783051 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.375 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204035247168 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780319761442 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101286411782 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162906519863 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119923339654 0.056905535591 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.