Almost everyone agrees that we should be training children to recycle waste to save the Earth’s natural resources. Some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste. Other argue that school is the best place to teach do this. Discuss both views.
The awareness of conservation environment by reprocessing objects among children has become a major topic of concern in modern society. Despite the argument that whether school or parents are responsible for such teaching, I am more convinced by the view that both school and parents should take the main role in teaching this.
It is widely believed that primary school should teach children the way of recycling the garbage to protect the environment. School can run some classes combined with some activities which can teach children how to recycle things that they can use for other purposes in life. For instance, a wide variety of bottles used to drink every day by the human. Instead of throwing it into the trash, the student will be taught how to reuse it by cutting half of the bottle and using it as a vase for flowers. As the result, lots of money will be saved for recycling waste and children can gain more knowledge about how to protect the environment.
On the other hand, more people hold the view that the majority of the responsibility to teach children about saving the environment must form parents. Because children spend most of their time with their family rather than at school. When they were a child, it will be easy for parents to teach such as these things for children. This method can be done throughout daily activities. An illustration for this is that we often have to deal with household waste every day, so parents can utilize them as materials to teach children the purposes of categorizing and reusing disposed items.
In conclusion, I firmly believed that school and parents also have the same obligation in teaching children how to reuse waste.
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- In modern society, it is posible to go shopping, work at communicate via the internet without face-to-face contact with another. To what extent do you think this is a positive or negative development? 56
- Some people think that when the criminals are punished and they will not continue to commit crimes. However, some people have repeatedly committed crimes. What do you think is the reason? What should be done to stop these people from continuing to commit 56
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extend do you agree are disagree? 61
- Almost everyone agrees that we should be training children to recycle waste to save the Earth s natural resources Some believe that it is parents who should teach their children to recycle waste Other argue that school is the best place to teach do this D 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e about how to protect the environment. On the other hand, more people hold the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ving the environment must form parents. Because children spend most of their time with ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 587, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ategorizing and reusing disposed items. In conclusion, I firmly believed that sc...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8615916955 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5698838708 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550173010381 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6035103207 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.076923077 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323006099995 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120845363752 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791665899706 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203633482865 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326525735277 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.