The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea what are the reason and solution

It is true that people are increasingly overexploiting both on land and in marine life, rendering numerous kinds of animals to never reemerge. There are number of reasons behind this trend, and several solutions should be adopted by individuals and the government to improve the situation.
To begin with, this tendency happens mainly due to two main reasons which are relating to commercial purposes as well as recreational pursuits. Firstly, the higher the standard of living is, the more demands on entertainment people need, which leads to many animal species being captures to act as an entertainment tool. Take, for example, ivories and horns for which numerous elephants and rhinoceros are being poached in order to purchase and produce ornaments. Another case in point, many tigers, gorillas and dolphins are held in captivities in zoos, circuses or holiday destinations to entertain customers or tourists. At the economic level, people can make profits from exploiting natural habitat. To illustrate, a significant number of aquatic features, such as fishes or crabs, are exported, and many animals are poached for fur or other valuable parts on a yearly basis.
However, the menace of rampant hunting can be fought by some feasible solution. Education is the main way to tackle this issue. People need to aware of protecting endanger species, say, by boycotting the products made from animal’s skin, thus reducing the market’s demand for these commodities. In addition, the authorities need to pass stricter regulations, such as life imprisonment, against illegal poaching and also find shelters for such animal species to reproduce.
In conclusion, there are various causes of overexploitation, and several actions should be produced to deal with these problems by the government coupled with residents at large. Although the issues are unlikely to be entirely eliminated in the short term, there are concrete steps to reduce the effects they are having on the current wild animals.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35873015873 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89279345413 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9490101049 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.571428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105307988202 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315086575539 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344142580463 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0634199811873 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445201974439 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.