The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea. What are the reasons and solutions?
There is no doubt that wildlife habitats are being destroyed and that whole species of animals are on the verge of disappearance due to human activities on land and in the sea. This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to help tackle the issue.
There are two main reasons why animals disappear: firstly, the loss of natural habitats from human activities, such as deforestation on farmland or marine debris. When the habitats are destroyed, this imposes a burden on plants and animals, thus causing populations to decline and extinction to become more important, especially when creatures take over the space to live due to systematic environmental destruction. Apart from habitat losses, illegal trafficking is a catastrophic event if we don't take immediate action. Since this leads to global animal extinction, This is because when threatened species are involved, any poaching of such species to provide illegal wildlife trade (e.g., poaching of elephants for ivory and tigers for skins and bones) imposes a high profit, further enhancing the risks of that species becoming extinct.
On the other hand, the government needs to argue with citizens in order to weigh one's options about the protection of the natural habitat, which influences the natural. The measure for that is to create a nature reserve. Moreover, illegal wildlife hunting and trafficking The government should make a law on hunting in order to solve this issue.
In conclusion, natural habitat losses and illegal wildlife hunting and trafficking are the two main drivers of animal extinction. To address this issue, governments must protect and restore natural ecosystems, and everyone should join hands to stop the illegal trade of endangered species.
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The table below shows key data on the demographics of four different countries
- More and more people want to buy clothes car and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- The favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble solutions to help tackle the issue. There are two main reasons why animals d...
^^^
Line 2, column 495, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...afficking is a catastrophic event if we dont take immediate action. Since this leads...
^^^^
Line 2, column 839, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... risks of that species becoming extinct. On the other hand, the government needs ...
^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...o argue with citizens in order to weigh ones options about the protection of the nat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on hunting in order to solve this issue. In conclusion, natural habitat losses an...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
e.g., first, firstly, if, moreover, so, thus, apart from, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39054604292 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596296296296 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.312269234 49.4020404114 246% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.0 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217726425915 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850541169866 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102267406688 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127392287564 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122076852144 0.056905535591 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.0946893788 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.2 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.