Are famous people treated unfairly by the media?
Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life?
Over the past few years, there has been a rise in media companies and it played a vital role in people's life, by changing the way they do business. However, people, especially celebrities, always worry about their privacy, famous people have a fair treatment by the media.
First, the media are fair to everybody, this is consists of a diversity of opinions that wrote by a lot of people. This gives a variety of information about an issue, which is clear and quite objective, by celebrities' fans, professors and authority. This means that celebrities should not be too pessimistic about it. In addition, because of the massive effects of media, the government can not take them lightly that's why there are some laws which banned to protect people, especially celebrities, from fairness treatment. Media companies can't write misinformation that affects celebrities' image and normal life as celebrities can sued these organizations to protect themselves.
fame and media attention should<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> be acknowledged that</span> they are tied to one another. Celebrities must be known that thanks to these activities they will pay more attention which means they become more and more famous. This helps them earn more money and improve their living standards. This suggests that both should share the same responsibility on the issue than blame for the media. In fact, celebrities should have more responsibility for their privacy. It's just media enterprises' job to seek and give hot news to the readership to have profits.
In conclusion, the pool of media is fair to celebrities. And it is clear that they should have measures and responsibility to make their life become more privacy.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 73
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media?Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life? 67
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 78
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media?Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life? 56
- Are famous people treated unfairly by the media?Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...he government can not take them lightly thats why there are some laws which banned to...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 541, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rom fairness treatment. Media companies cant write misinformation that affects celeb...
^^^^
Line 11, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fame
...zations to protect themselves. fame and media attention should ^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35636363636 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12505206568 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574545454545 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.897586329 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314382990244 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10689848068 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778759335354 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211508286343 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797921568811 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.