The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Nowadays, people tend to have less work to do owing to technology; therefore, some maintain that in the future, our health might decline. This essay sets out to show a strong disagreement and also argue that the statement is false.
There are few points supporting the idea that human’s health could be worse by the time. It is true that those technology creating robots and virtual intelligence have been developed, which means soon, those physical works, such as house choirs, building and shipping, would be handled by robots. One illustration for this is wiping robot. Most houses in cities have their own wiping-house robot which can clean floors automatically. What special about this kind of robot is the ability to recognize liquid and dust in order to clean with a suitable method.
Nevertheless, due to the improvement of both medication and science in the future, I believe that our health in average will be higher compared to the present. Those improvements allow expert to create a variety of vaccine for us to prevent virus and sickness, which could be a major threat to our existence. Taking covid-19 for an example, thanks to the vaccine, millions of people had been saved. This would not happened if the covid-19 took place in the past.
Additionally, taking exercise and working out daily are the major elements building good health. As long as people have an awareness about excercicing and eating a sustainable diet, their health will be engage, not only physically but also mentally.
All in all, from where I stand, I mostly support the fact that people’ health is seems to be strengthen over the time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | UYEN NGUYEN DO TO | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | UYEN NGUYEN DO TO | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | vuhungbo | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | Areeb Rooman | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | Areeb Rooman | 73 | view |
- The charts below give information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011
- The charts below give information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011
- Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought up by wealthy parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this technology' or 'those technologies'?
Suggestion: this technology; those technologies
...d be worse by the time. It is true that those technology creating robots and virtual intelligenc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'happen'
Suggestion: happen
...f people had been saved. This would not happened if the covid-19 took place in the past....
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, kind of, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66965751258 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624087591241 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4846910539 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8571428571 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181733955978 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594701594724 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314330828305 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974278026858 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129951266897 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.