The best way to improve road safety is to lower speed limits. To what extent do you agree?
The number of road accidents is increasing year by year. Some people suggest reducing the maximum speed limit in order to prevent this growing trend; however, I believe that other alternatives are far more effective.
There are some valid reasons why reduction in speed limit can have a positive impact on road safety. The main one is that it could be protective for the general public as it gives drivers more time to react to the situation. For example, lower speeds can help drivers stop more quickly to avoid hitting a passenger who swerve into the road suddenly. In addition to this, the less the speed of a car, the less the severity of an accident. If a driver crashes into a tree or wall at 30 km/h, the damage may be negligible compared to colliding it at 70 or 80 km/h. However, this is not to say it is the best way.
Nevertheless, in my opinion, other methods can provide better results regarding road safety. The number-one option is to train drivers in high quality courses. This training should include defensive driving skills, impacts caused by injuries and death, understanding the importance of road infrastructure and strict testing system in the long run. Increasing the number of cameras and road traffic controllers is another effective solution. This is because these discourage car drivers to speed up and even if they do, it may cause many fines which can lead to burden of budget. Thus, above-mentioned alternatives would be more practical.
To conclude, although low speed limits can diminish car accidents and seriousness of the damage, I think that this is not the best way of improving road safety.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-18 | Thai Tran | 84 | view |
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 67
- Today more people are waiting until their thirties to get married and have children Do you think this is a positive or negative development 87
- The growth of online courses will one day lead to all universities closing To what extent do you agree 67
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more widely available Do the disadvantages of this outweigh the advantages 74
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think this is happening How can this issue be solved 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... is that it could be protective for the general public as it gives drivers more time to react ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 611, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this is not to say it is the best way. Nevertheless, in my opinion, other metho...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, for example, i think, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71401674128 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5756358203 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201994469529 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660640878781 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661215284886 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139499897359 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668928811057 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... is that it could be protective for the general public as it gives drivers more time to react ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 611, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this is not to say it is the best way. Nevertheless, in my opinion, other metho...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, for example, i think, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71401674128 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5756358203 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201994469529 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660640878781 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661215284886 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139499897359 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668928811057 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.