The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that the most effective solution to environmental pollution around the world is to lift the price of fuel. I can only partly agree with this view.
On the one hand, raising the cost of fuel can have a direct impact on the demand for fuel consumption. From a consumer’s perspective, when fuel is less of an affordable commodity, the motive to drive and use fuel-powered engines in households would be weakened. As a result, less carbon dioxide emissions would be released into the atmosphere, and, at the same time, people will search for other types of energy, most of which available are less detrimental to the environment compared to fossil fuel. The same pattern of behavior could be seen in industries where companies race to reduce the consumption of fuel to bring the cost of production and profit under control.
On the other hand, more actions need to be taken to deal with such a major issue as environmental contamination. Firstly, tougher policies related to the environment should be in place to limit the amount of carbon dioxide released into the air. To do this, CO2 quotas should be imposed on industries, and those breaking the law should be punished with zero tolerance. Besides, environment protection campaigns should be encouraged and given adequate publicity to raise awareness of the environmental issue. When one is conscious of the seriousness of the current situation, he or she will be more likely to engage in the preservation efforts.
In conclusion, adjustments to fuel prices alone are insufficient to protect the environment. The government should enact stringent policies and encourage preservation attempts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-30 | tieuquynh | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | tieuquynh | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-17 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2020-05-25 | Hương Giang | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that the range of technology available to individuals is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people Others think this has an opposite effect Discuss both view and give your own opinion 78
- The use of the mobile phone is antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- A person spends most of his or her time in the workplace and life becomes meaningless when there is no job satisfaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Oil use of major consumers 77
- Oil consumption by major consumers 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, so, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13653136531 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02992253196 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590405904059 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9471010476 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.076923077 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141021241907 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542117733395 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045744522052 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945284821319 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418089577817 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.