Both men and women these days work full-time, so it is logical for them to share household chores equally. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The gender role of society has changed dramatically since the world became more developed. There has been a long-standing tradition that men should make ends meet, where women are the main housekeepers and caretakers. However, these days, both females and males are pursuing full-time employment. I completely believe that it is sensible for both genders to do domestic chores, as it can not only exert a positive influence on people's lives, but it can also boost society's prosperity.
Equal division of household chores has provided people with healthier lifestyles since they have more free time and undertake less stress. Indeed, women frequently felt tense about doing laundry, baby-sitting, and other household chores, which eat up their spare time for personal interests and passions. However, as men are doing errands with them, they can rather meet friends, play sports, live more actively, instead of suffering negative emotions.
Moreover, the benefits of sharing equally housework are also true for men, as they can share the burdensome of being the breadwinners with their wives. According to recent surveys, in 2000, 50% more individuals answered that they were more content about their lives when compared to ten years earlier.
On a societal level, the equivalent contribution to household chores can increase productivity and achievement in employment, thereby accelerates the economy of society. Women and men can work and dedicate more than half of their time to work, this is the result of the equal time spent at home doing household chores. Furthermore, if there are males and females in the workforce, new inventions and ideas can be generated by each gender's capacity and skillset. This can inevitably enhance the companies' economy and society's development as a whole.
In conclusion, I ascertain that equal housework division can be for the betterment of not only individuals, which is better lives, but also of human society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-23 | Doan Ngoc Truc | 56 | view |
- Many people believe that formal pen and paper examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement What is your view of examinations 84
- Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household chores equally To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries many graduates can find jobs after schools What is the causes of this problem What can be done about this 78
- As languages such as English Spanish and Mandarin become more widely spoken there is a fear that many minority languages may die out Some countries have taken steps to protect minority languages What is your view of this practice 84
- In some countries small town center shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and this may result in an increase in the use of cars Do 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 495, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...illset. This can inevitably enhance the companies economy and societys development as a w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80257031168 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605177993528 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2717679287 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.714285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237945403681 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790122532387 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695351248226 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123001086865 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469258180456 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.