Both men and women these days work full-time, so it is logical for them to share household chores equally. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Hitherto, divergent opinions regarding whether it is reasonable for males and females to take the same responsibility for the household tasks when both of them have full-time work. I, as a protestor, legitably advocate this sentiment.
Admittedly, it is not absurd that both of them share the same housework at home and help their partner lessen stress and burden on their shoulders. This can be explained by the fact that in the modern world with the gender equality, the amount of work as well as appointments for men and women are distributed equally without any discrimination. To be more accurate, if both sexes devote their time to a full-time job, it signifies that they all have their own work-related pressure and difficulty. Therefore, it is challenging for an individual to manage their job and housework simultaneously. Due to it, men or women having the time frame at home after getting off work can help each other with chores.
Further and more prominently, dividing the household in an equal way is more inclined to strengthen the bond between each member in a particular family. Take child care as an exemplary model, practically, some still keep the conventional opinion that women have to take charge of housework involving nurturing their children. Thereby, the tie of motherhood seems to be much stronger than that of fatherhood. As a result, especially males, should take advantage of the time period that they stay at home to share the household tasks with their partner such as taking care of their children so that they can maintain the durable relationship between each member in that family.
To sum up, I firmly believe that when women and men have to work with a full-time job, it is undisputed that they should equally share the same household mission.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | Phuong1810 | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-27 | Vu Tuan Anh | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | trucvy112233 | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-23 | Doan Ngoc Truc | 56 | view |
| 2021-05-25 | Tạ Tiểu Nhật | 60 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 78
- Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household chores equally To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Task 1 The diagrams illustrate the design of a single and double room study area 78
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... advocate this sentiment. Admittedly, it is not absurd that both of them share...
^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an equal way" with adverb for "equal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ore prominently, dividing the household in an equal way is more inclined to strengthen the bond...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, well, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84337196872 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535117056856 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8672007872 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.583333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241244704329 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893613565485 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730215107274 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173402627846 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581818945564 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.