Both men and women these days work full time so it is logical for them to share household chores equally To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Both men and women these days work full-time, so it is logical for them to share household chores equally. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent times, women work as much as other genders. Some people still believe that women are responsible for entire household chores. However, I completely argue that men and women have to share household equally.
There are several reasons why sharing household chores like washing dishes, cleaning the house, and drying clothes,…brings beneficial. Firstly, sharing household chores offers oppotunities for women to take part in other activities. The role of women is changed through century, women nowadays can be able to do anything to serve the social demand. Dividing house chores decreases burdensome that women have to carry. Subsequently, women will spend more time on social activities which has more positive impact to the country. General statics office of Viet Nam has shown that the judgment of women in government apparatus increased 15 per cent of the success in any decision to revamp instructions or developing the law.
On top of that, cooperating household chores together strengthen the bond between each members. It not only reduce women’s burdensome but also make them happier with their current life. For instance, if men wash dishes and women dry clothes, both of them feel understanding their companion. As a result, the happiness of these families remain durablely through several years live together. In addition, doing household chores is not occupied numerous time so that both men and women can do it without affecting their work.
In conclusion, for these reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that household chores should be divided for both sexes in order to keep families happy and to social advantages.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-13 Phuong1810 67 view
2023-01-27 Vu Tuan Anh 78 view
2022-12-07 trucvy112233 67 view
2021-10-23 Doan Ngoc Truc 56 view
2021-05-25 Tạ Tiểu Nhật 60 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
..., cleaning the house, and drying clothes,…brings beneficial. Firstly, sharing hous...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on top of that

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32699619772 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73968027249 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.631178707224 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3587741665 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349411715999 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115231674577 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755269721315 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211313641831 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558212057902 0.056905535591 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.