The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984.
The bar graphs show the percentages of the population, in terms of age, in both genders of France and India in 1984.
Overall, while the age structure of female and male equalized in India, the proportions of women were higher than men at the same age in France. Besides, the population of India was younger than France in 1984.
In India, the age group below 5 was the most popular resident (14%). When people grow older, the percentage which they accounted for population tends to decrease, and the lowest point was 2% in the age group 65-70. Inhabitants were aged over 70 occupied nearly 3% of the age structure.
In France, people were aged 40-45 had the same percentage as their counterpart in India (6%). While the rates of age groups below 40 were lesser than these figures in India, the inhabitants were aged 30-35 occupied the highest point (8%) and higher than the equivalent figure in India (7%). Besides, residents were aged over 70 accounted for 10% in France population.
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or a negative development? 61
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 61
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 89
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... India was younger than France in 1984. In India, the age group below 5 was the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 1615.20841683 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 171.0 315.596192385 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73099415205 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48055258712 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 176.041082164 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 506.74238477 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3603005387 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8888888889 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 7.06120827912 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353402723171 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169013800594 0.084324248473 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695761077474 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241630982574 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496817875557 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 78.4519038076 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.