Cheaper products
INTRODUCTION
Consumers can meet their personal demand with a wider range of diverse products at a cheaper price. Although the living standard of people may be advantageous, its demerits of this trend cannot be overlooked.
BODY
Nowadays, manufacturers rely on mass production, which as an economic process incurs fewer labor costs, material costs, efficiently utilizes resources. As a result, they can develop lower production costs.
One advantage could be that electronic devices can be bought at lower prices while still maintaining a variety of features and greater speed of processing such as Android cell phones are available in the market at an acceptable price. This leads to every student can afford so as to improve their study efficiency.
Secondly, consumers spend a lesser amount of monthly expenditure on basic necessities such as clothes, food. This helps us saving money for other aspects of life such as education, entertainment, and health.
On the other hand, purchasing cheaper products brings certain drawbacks.
Firstly, the living standard has improved and basic needs are easily met these days and more people have the opportunities to select from more options. However, people are purchasing things that do not even need. A single person has multiple cell phones and they are busy all day with their cell phones and the internet. Thus people are becoming less social.
Another drawback could be that fast food, which contains high levels of fat and calories, causes develop health problems such as obesity, cardiovascular diseases, and digestive diseases. This leads to have a negative effect on the quality of life and waste money on medical treatment.
CONCLUSION
Taking everything into consideration, availability of consumer products at an affordable price is a positive trend as it helps people to lead a better life. However, the negative sides of this trend cannot be forgotten. Social, personal and environmental problems are ever increasing due to this and it might be a serious threat for the future generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | nguyenkhangtriem | 11 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | nguyenkhangtriem | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-05 | nhbngan | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | hueyy | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-09 | tieuquynh | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... This leads to every student can afford so as to improve their study efficiency. Second...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 69, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...lesser amount of monthly expenditure on basic necessities such as clothes, food. This helps us sa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 123, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[8]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to save' or 'save'.
Suggestion: to save; save
...es such as clothes, food. This helps us saving money for other aspects of life such as...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mer products at an affordable price is a positive trend as it helps people to lea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, as to, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36419753086 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85533697583 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614197530864 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0868381716 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5555555556 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11111111111 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133391527829 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503545914096 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107068130886 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877447404527 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125958735056 0.056905535591 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.