People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do advantages outweigh disadvantages?
Today we are living in the age of commercialism with different trading activities, so individuals in society can purchase inexpensive goods. In my view, I believe the merits outweigh the drawbacks.
People today are able to buy more affordable products, which means that the gap between the rich and the poor is lessened. For example, many mobile phone manufacturers are producing cheaper products that can meet the needs of people having the different financial abilities. Moreover, the less pricy the merchandise is, the more demand the companies need. If the consumption of products increases rapidly among citizens, employers have to hire a large number of workers in order to meet the needs of consumers. Therefore, this will promote the country's economic development.
On the other hand, there are some adverse effects that need to be addressed. People consume a great number of goods, which may release more household waste and industrial effluent. Consequently, people will be faced with much environmental pollution. This may make them suffer from serious health problems, typically influencing the immune system. Additionally, with the exaggeration of emissions, not only do they cause pollution, but they also worsen the process of global warming having more unexpected consequences in living habitats than ever.
In conclusion, supplying affordable merchandise will bring more benefits, and make them universally attainable to lower-income families. Nevertheless, the government should pass laws to raise awareness in the community about environmental issues to make this approach better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-05 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-24 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | kevann | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-12 | Mollymaul | 80 | view |
| 2023-10-05 | BoyClazz | 78 | view |
- Topic The chart below shows the percentages of five kinds of magazines sold by a company in the UK between 2001 and 2009 73
- Topic Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Topic The graph shows the number of people taking part in 4 kinds of sports in a particular region between 1985 and 2005 84
- The graph shows the average number of UK commuters traveling each day by car bus and train between 1970 and 2030 84
- Topic It is true that traveling to other countries helps us understand other cultures and their traditions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... among citizens, employers have to hire a large number of workers in order to meet the needs of c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66115702479 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04641596451 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.673553719008 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6989946223 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8571428571 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149553221889 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413397350847 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045711867553 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733973826253 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420647720615 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.