Children are generally more successful in foreign language studies than adults Thus it is better to learn languages in childhood Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

Essay topics:

Children are generally more successful in foreign language studies than adults. Thus, it is better to learn languages in childhood.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

The topic of cognitive possibilities of different age groups representers has been bringing nearly everyone’s attention since ancient times. Namely, an opinion exists, that younger generation skills of consuming and processing information in the field of unnative vocabulary mainly dominates over older ones. I completely agree the above-mentioned point of view due to the reasons marked hereinafter.
First of all, the advantage of kids’ fast-track studying ability in every sphere is natural for them due to high neural links activity in early ages. Speed of memorization that collaborates with high volume of brains’ resourses creates a huge impact on improvement of tuition process in these early ages. The fact that foreign world and culture knowledge of such young students as small as understanding of their native nature presents a wide horizon for observing new terms. As “polyglots’ point of view” presents, the superior of translators that participate in nowadays international projects of hi-tech companies known at least 3 languages in the age of 10. Thus, extraordinary thinking activity in childhood creates a window of opportunity of fast gaining language talent to those who will invest their will and time for improvement.
Secondary, insane amount of free time that is available in the result of missing work duties allows juveniles to simply spend more time on practicing dialects. Within the growing of teenagers as a unit of society, prioritizing of social and career development over spending time behind the language books becomes a fix idea for them. The adjustable learning track provided by cutting-edge technologies in the computer era, as statistic shows, cannot really fulfill their potential for those who desires instant results. The popular ‘Duolingo’ service, for example, reports that only 2% of ‘English basics’ course participants grownups were able to reach ’10 day’s strike’ of everyday tests program and pass the exam. Hence, time-consuming activities that will unavoidably appear in the timetable as time flows, may become the key factor of achieving goals in this field.
To conclude, the fenomen of juniors’ high productivity in studying of foreign languages is based on both lifestyle and biological attributes. This tendency shows that late attempts of tongue self-studiyng almost always leads to failure due to multiple reasons.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-09 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 89 view
2022-08-28 tieneenne 61 view
2021-10-19 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 84 view
2021-05-04 Firdouspathan 61 view
2020-10-20 trần ngọc tuấn 77 view
Essays by user SUSANNA PETROSYAN :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ulary mainly dominates over older ones. I completely agree the above-mentioned po...
^
Line 3, column 839, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...time flows, may become the key factor of achieving goals in this field. To concl...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, really, second, so, thus, at least, for example, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58196721311 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07479400082 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674863387978 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2155197641 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 136.2 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119764435307 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354568245049 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336735062698 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0630983574073 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027149362213 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ulary mainly dominates over older ones. I completely agree the above-mentioned po...
^
Line 3, column 839, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...time flows, may become the key factor of achieving goals in this field. To concl...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, really, second, so, thus, at least, for example, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58196721311 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07479400082 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674863387978 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.2155197641 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 136.2 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119764435307 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354568245049 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336735062698 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0630983574073 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027149362213 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.