Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some of or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?
In recent decades, the question of whether or not the government should pay for children’s education has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this assistance is not without the disadvantages, the upsides will be far more significant.
There are a number of drawbacks of this sponsorship. First, since the sustainable development of a nation requires to have many investments in many fields, paying all of the costs for children’s education can put more burden on national budgets. In fact, the governments need to fund properly for many key areas, such as healthcare, economy, education, which implies that every citizen should shoulder the responsibility of paying for their children’s schooling fees. Second, by supporting children’s education, either a part or all the costs, the governments could create unfairness to childless people. This means that they may feel angry or irritated if knowing that their taxable income is not spent on their benefits.
Nevertheless, other benefits of educational sponsorship for children’s tuition fees will be far more significant. First, in order to guarantee the qualified workforce down the road, investing in children’s education is considered as a win-win solution. This means that meager income families can let their children, especially aspiring ones, go to school, which will, in turn, bring the national workforce an array of benefits in the sense that young generations will become qualified and talented employees. Second, if parents released the burden from their children’s fees of schooling, there is a good chance that they would have good take care of their offspring. For example, parents can have more budgets to buy more foods or clothes for their children, improving their standard of living as a result.
In conclusion, it is a wise decision when the government is inclined to finance children’s education, even some or all of it, despite some disadvantages anticipated. By acknowledging the importance of children's education, officers will lead their country to a higher level of development.
- The graph below shows trends in US meat poultry consumption 11
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 71
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 78
- Extreme sports such as sky diving and skiing are very dangerous and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 73
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In recent decades, the question of whether or not the government should pay for ch...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...many investments in many fields, paying all of the costs for children’s education can put ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, even so, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47076923077 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13090190609 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566153846154 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4492628038 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221498177281 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770990240327 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085385162466 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154702973493 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879105143427 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.