Companies are responsible only for making money for their investors. Therefore, They should not be held accountable for the environmental and social cost of their business activity to society as a whole. Businesses should do no more than concentrate on making a profit.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
When companies face the issue of capitalistic and environmental viewpoints, opinions are divided. The first mentioned assumes the priority of companies as their profit, while the opposite one supposes that as a negative impact, not only to surroundings but also to company’s social rating. In this essay, I will discuss my position toward holding accountable for the effect on the environment.
First of all, green issues are on the top of the green political agenda, and firms that evince care of nature by limiting pollution, encouraging recycling, are favorably appreciated by society. Therefore this approach in addition to being environmentally friendly gives the company high status over others. Moreover, caring not only about green issues but also about the social environment could take their marketability to the next level, in view of economic reward.
Switching to the only-profit strategy, at first look, seems advantageous. To support, should more companies focus on maximum income, with the rise of GDP, they may elevate the country’s economy. Although, this is regarded to be a short-term benefit and especially risky, as they may find themselves subject to negative social reactions. In the other words, organizations integrating their business activity with environmental regard are more likely to see their successful future.
To recapitulate, businesses should not bury their head in the sand when it comes to surrounding regard. Although it might look advantageous at first sight for the economy, it is better to keep awareness of environmental and social stance toward green issues. If these factors are considered, companies even can boost their revenues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-25 | shohruh.fayzulloyev | 83 | view |
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are disrupting social interaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones are disrupting social interaction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- Some people believe that the advent of economical air travel has been very beneficial by making international travel more accessible, while others argue that it has had a very negative impact. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 56
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives.What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures? 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
..., are favorably appreciated by society. Therefore this approach in addition to being envi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53281853282 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05465193861 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640926640927 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.326841059 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.230769231 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292908698651 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091855963912 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504551739312 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168881538084 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505515487983 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
..., are favorably appreciated by society. Therefore this approach in addition to being envi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53281853282 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05465193861 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640926640927 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.326841059 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.230769231 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292908698651 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091855963912 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504551739312 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168881538084 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505515487983 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.