companies should provide sports facilities for local communities. To what extend do you agree?
The question of whether companies should provide sports facilities for local communities is a subject of ongoing discussion. While some argue that companies should take the lead in promoting physical activity and community bonding, others contend that this responsibility should primarily lie with the government. In this essay, I will explore both perspectives and present my own opinion.
Proponents argue that companies have the financial resources and capabilities to invest in sports facilities for local communities. By doing so, they can contribute to the well-being of the community and promote an active and healthy lifestyle. Providing sports facilities can foster a sense of belonging and encourage social interaction among community members. Moreover, it can serve as a form of corporate social responsibility, enhancing the company's reputation and building a positive relationship with the local community.
However, critics believe that the government should take the lead in providing sports facilities to ensure equal access for all citizens. They argue that relying solely on companies may lead to uneven distribution, favoring areas where businesses are more prevalent. Additionally, the government has the authority and resources to develop comprehensive and sustainable sports infrastructure, ensuring long-term maintenance and accessibility. Government-funded sports facilities can prioritize the needs of underserved communities and promote a more equitable society.
In my opinion, while it is commendable for companies to contribute to the community by providing sports facilities, the primary responsibility lies with the government. A collaborative approach between the private and public sectors is crucial to establish comprehensive and sustainable solutions. Companies can play a role in partnering with the government to develop sports complexes, leveraging their resources and expertise. Meanwhile, the government should oversee accessibility, prioritize underserved communities, and ensure the long-term maintenance of these facilities. By working together, we can create a healthier and more inclusive society that offers recreational opportunities for all community members.
- companies should provide sports facilities for local communities To what extend do you agree 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people believe that the experiences children have before they go to school will have the greatest effect on their future life Others argue that experiences gained when they are teenagers have a bigger influence Discuss both views and give your own op 78
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading To what extend do you agree 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether companies should provide sports facilit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15857605178 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44208495052 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540453074434 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5656615766 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.9375 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9375 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361498508854 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124519315214 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111311176344 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239280113139 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512440933809 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.35 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.45 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether companies should provide sports facilit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.15857605178 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44208495052 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540453074434 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5656615766 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.9375 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9375 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361498508854 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124519315214 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111311176344 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239280113139 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512440933809 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.35 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.45 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.