Companies should provide sports facilities(physical acitivites to have a healthy well-beings) for local communities. To what extent do you agree?
In contemporary society, there has been a significant surge in the adoption of corporate social responsibility by organizations, which aims to enhance the well-being of individuals. One prevailing belief is that it is essential for firms to provide sports facilities for the public. While this idea holds some validity, I respectfully disagree with this statement.
On the one hand, the promotion of brand names is considered a compelling reason behind companies' involvement in sports facilities. With the increasing popularity of physical activities among the community, people nowadays frequently engage in sports to cater to their health needs. By providing sports equipment adorned with their brand names or logos in specific areas, companies can leave an indelible impression on individuals in the vicinity, thus becoming household names within the community. To exemplify this view, it is well-known that prominent private organizations in Vietnam primarily focus on investing in equipment for building complexes, enticing residents to participate in physical activities.
On the other hand, while private companies do benefit from investing in sports facilities, I firmly believe that both governments and individuals should also contribute funds for these purposes. Given the exorbitant costs involved, relying solely on companies may result in inadequate equipment for residents. Therefore, it is imperative for governments, citizens, and private organizations to collaborate and invest in these amenities, ensuring that there are sufficient resources available for individuals who recognize the significant role of sports in improving both physical and mental health.
In conclusion, although there are merits to the proliferation of a particular company's brand name through their investment in sports facilities, I contend that it is crucial for the public and the government to also play an active role. This collective effort will help foster awareness of public health and ensure the availability of adequate resources for physical activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-15 | kimphung1112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | kimphung1112 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | kimphung1112 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | thaohienpt008 | 73 | view |
- Companies should provide sports facilities physical acitivites to have a healthy well beings for local communities To what extent do you agree 67
- Companies should provide sports facilities physical acitivites to have a healthy well beings for local communities To what extent do you agree 78
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can be better for their overall skills development and creativity than reading To what extent do you agree 56
- Companies should provide sports facilities physical acitivites to have a healthy well beings for local communities To what extent do you agree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...s considered a compelling reason behind companies involvement in sports facilities. With ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82450331126 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19844411158 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586092715232 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.9167845355 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.583333333 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222569104575 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821117247596 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458832791188 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133557501142 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229482469188 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.