Computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper, as a result, more adults’ work at home and children study at home. Is this a positive or negative development?
It is true that computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper, which has created a virtual world that is transforming human life profoundly. By virtue of this trend, more and more people are inclined to choose home-working or home-schooling. I hold a conviction that it is both positive and negative phenomenon.
On the one hand, people can reap several benefits from this trend. One of the most obvious advantages of this development is greater flexibility. By working remotely, employees can start their working days after they finish household chores or childcare responsibilities, rather than sticking to a fixed timetable. Students can work at their own pace since online courses spare them the trouble of struggling to keep up with teachers in classes. Moreover, the advent of computers can enhance the availability of employment and education regardless of geographical barriers. Home-working enables employers to recruit people living in a long-distance or even disabled workers, thus making job opportunities more accessible to individuals. Similarly, for students who live in a far-flung place or those with physical handicaps, online learning is an appropriate choice.
On the other hand, it should be noted that this trend might give rise to some potential problems. Employers may have to face difficulties in monitoring and evaluating employees' performance if a company is largely dominated by a flexible work mode. Likewise, distance-learning may lead to the possibility that some young students who lack self-discipline would be affected by violence and pornography on the Internet. Even more, this trend can result in the lack of close-knit community, because children and employees just stay at home without partaking or interacting with other people.
In conclusion, although technological advancements, especially computers, contribute to a forward-looking home-working and home-schooling, we still need to notice their hidden threats and take advantage of this trend in moderation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | lauranguyen_97 | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | elveslord77 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | elveslord77 | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-09 | kaka singh | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | kaka singh | 56 | view |
- In many cities, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss both views 73
- News is playing a vital role in our life today and people are getting much influenced by the news now. Some say that news has no connection with most people's life and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspaper and watch television news p 84
- Some people take temporary jobs, for they have time to do other things. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Many people believe that teachers should take responsibilities for their students to judge what is right or wrong and behave well, while other feel that teachers should only teach academic subjects. Discuss both view and give your own opinion. 78
- Today there is a great increase in anti-social behaviour and lack of respect for others. What are the cause of this? What measure can be taken to solve the problem? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, look, may, moreover, similarly, so, still, thus, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65346534653 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41570287182 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643564356436 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8181088897 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.2 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344280663349 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983966606419 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935008464436 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212376406128 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104643106413 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.