Computers are now the basis of the modern world. They should therefore be introduced into classrooms, and their programs used for direct teaching purposes.Argue both sides and give your opinion.

The Role of computers in contemporary era is considered crucial. Many opine that, computers should be used for teaching purposes. However, others argue dependency on the computer is detrimental to students. In my opinion, positive and negative aspects are equal in measure.
Enhancement in technology has upgraded traditional style of teaching. Consequently, producing ease in life of teachers and students by decreasing their workload. For instance, in past teachers used to write on blackboard with chalk while standing for hours leading to consumption of energy. In addition, wastage of precious time is also encountered as a student has to copy lengthy lectures written on blackboard. With the help of computers now students can save time by getting lectures in PDF form. Furthermore, teachers can reuse these typed lectures as curriculum is rarely superseded. Hence, computers must be introduced into classrooms to utilise blessings that technology creates.
Although, computers have produced convenience in teaching methods, its negative aspects of students cannot be denied. Computers have a hazardous impact on students’ intellectual level. Students are deterred from brainstorming. To illustrate, auto correction system in computer restrains students to remain to remember correct spellings. This has significant negative impact on students leading to dependency on computers. Moreover, the modern technique gives the educators plenty of opportunities to run the lesson without interaction among students. Therefore, there is a lack of communication and co-operation in the education system nowadays.
To conclude, the education system has been modernized by widespread use of computers, creating comfort in teaching methods. Harmful impact is equivalent to benefits.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d for teaching purposes. However, others argue dependency on the computer is det...
^^
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...However, others argue dependency on the computer is detrimental to students. In ...
^^
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ast teachers used to write on blackboard with chalk while standing for hours lead...
^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n teaching methods, its negative aspects of students cannot be denied. Computers ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89961389961 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22366771112 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625482625483 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.41263902 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.4 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.95 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204661722169 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546883731197 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684959503183 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125318408617 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639092804156 0.056905535591 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.05 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.