In countries where the unemployment rates are high, most pupils should be offered only primary education; there is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding jobs. Do you agree or disagree?
In today’s world, most countries show a great concern about education. It is thought that in several countries where the rate of joblessness is high, most people should be offered only elementary education. There is no need to offer junior high education for people having no hope of getting a job. From my perspective, I remain unconvinced with this statement.
To begin with, the most frequent factor contributing to my view is that there are myriad benefits related to jobs which secondary education brings. While grammar schools equip people with primary knowledge of numeracy and literacy, secondary students are provided with basic lessons of diverse fields regarding science. As a result, exposure to those sources of knowledge enables learners to obtain insight into their abilities and limitations, allowing them to have basic job orientation. For instance, those who are proficient in languages are likely to become diplomats, translators, tour guides and so on, whereas those excelling in numerical calculation may develop to be accountants, bankers, investors and so forth. Therefore, it has been scientifically proven that secondary education plays an essential role in the social division of labour.
In addition, one explanation to support my point of view is that in the contemporary world, the labour force is required to have substantial knowledge about advanced technology. According to the US Bureau of Labour Statistics found in 2012, more than half of the jobs required some kind of technology skills. Moreover, by 2020, that number reaches 77 per cent. In fact, prime understanding in academic subjects attained from junior high school serves as the concrete foundation for higher education, where they drill deeper into the world of science. Therefore, if people do not absorb the knowledge of secondary education, they will not be able to master any state-of-the-art technologies in today’s society. That will lead to a greater risk of being jobless encountered afterwards.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that people with no hope of finding a job should be offered secondary education because of the good sides which elementary education brings. Hence, I wholly disagree with the claim.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-04 | doquytuan | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | anann2712 | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | nam.phanthanh97 | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-13 | Huy Do | 84 | view |
- With the development of technology and science some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musicians and painters What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot Should we encourage the art area 61
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which do you think is a better educational system 73
- The maps show the art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many People are choosing to find information online rather than in books Is this a positive or negative development 61
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which do you think is a better educational system 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39316239316 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97369849998 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603988603989 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0840188707 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.352941176 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6470588235 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366943205687 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986137607722 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10816046174 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229446953246 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108476356035 0.056905535591 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.