Crime rates will fall as advances in technology make it easier to detect and prevent crimes To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the last few decades, the felony rate has been increasing at alarming rate. However, Some inhabitant surmise that, with the of help of proliferating technology, ration of crime will be mitigated as it make convinient to search and deter crimes. In my opinion, I disaccord with this notion since technology is too vast to monitor and give more options to the offenders.
To Commence with the most salient reason wny accelerating technology less likely to curb crime rates. Internet is too immense to effectively control and monitor which should be taken into account. To explain further, offenders have more options to commite crime easily because of augmenting techmology which can propel them to do crime. Cyber is the best example which can not be neglected. Due to this, nowadays, people face numerous obstacles regarding hacking, money laundering, blackmailing and so on. Moreover, there is a less chance to catch offenders beforehands by counter terrorist units and civil survelliance as they have more security options to safeguard their lawbreaking actions.
Another worth considering downside of this scenario is low-tech crime as there should be no abatement noticed in the low-tech crime. Owing to the dearth requirements of technology in this crime such as hijacking, poaching, domestic violence, severity. For example, sexual harassments are still on the rise even though there should be chance to get arrested with the assist of technology. Apart from this, culprit have better technological knowledge as compered to police officers. Because of this reason larger authority may face some detrimental circumstances even if they have severe security systems.
To recapitulate, even though advancement in technology has skyrocketed, I deem that offence rate will be diminish provided that harsh sentence as well as long imprisonment should be given to culprit as they think twice before committing crime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-22 | Dharti Patel | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | Dharti Patel | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-30 | jay1451 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-30 | sonnn | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-04 | sonnguyen | 89 | view |
- Some people claim that public museum and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of arts by using a computers Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Some people say that every human being can create cot others think only the people born with the ability can create art Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Crime rates will fall as advances in technology make it easier to detect and prevent crimes To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Recent research has shown that media like Internet and TV have a greater influence over people s lives than politicians Which do yo consider to be the greater influence 84
- Many historical sites and museums mainly visited by tourist not local people why is this the case what can be done to attract local people to visit this historical sites and museums 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'chanced'?
Suggestion: chanced
...on the rise even though there should be chance to get arrested with the assist of tech...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, well, apart from, for example, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91053832363 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636666666667 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7633778886 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.6 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18810725651 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589445544653 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576717246142 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121262224521 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219043148137 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.