Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport why is it not popular in many places? How to increase its popularity
Although riding a bicycle is a better way to protect the environment than using other types of vehicles, it is less likely to attract the most people. A range of reasons are identified and some solutions could be proposed to address this issue and promote the usage of bicycles.
On the one hand, there are many strong reasons why using the bicycle is limited to people in many big cities. Firstly, modern life is becoming much busier than in the past, individuals nowadays have difficulty to manage their time with the use of the bicycle. As a result, people prefer to travel other types of vehicles such as car, subway, and bus in order to save time and physically demanding. Secondly, people who commute by cycling have more tendency to face with health problems such as lung cancer or respiratory disease. This results in the urban areas where often produce the amount of gas emission released into the air. Finally, unpredictable danger could be happened when cyclists have to share lanes with other means of transport. For example, commuters by bike are likely to avoid weigh vehicles as the container, so they have no space to free moving in the street.
On the other hand, governments play a vital role in adopting the strict policy. First solution is that it is important to increase people's awareness of saving our living environment. For instance, government authorities should introduce campaigns to propagate the harmful effects of fuel vehicles on the public health and encourage citizens to attempt to cycle as much as possible. Another measurement is to upgrade and expand transport infrastructure, especially road systems and create dedicated cycle lanes to prevent unexpected accidents. Furthermore, the restriction of a large number of private car by making it more costly. This can be done by increasing petrol price or raising taxes on these vehicles before going to central zones.
In conclusion, there are several reasons why bicycles are becoming less common in today's world, I believe that solutions would be produced to promote this environmentally friendly means of transport.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-02 | sonchip96hb | 89 | view |
| 2017-08-02 | sonchip96hb | 89 | view |
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views. 67
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person's nature. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 91
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...idents. Furthermore, the restriction of a large number of private car by making it more costly. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10693641618 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73765945856 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612716763006 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9203455724 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.4375 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165951312436 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471972612923 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336679310583 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942062536097 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292520151016 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.