Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits and TV channels. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of this?
In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that we are living in small global village and so it is obvious to see similarity in different habitants and culture. Some people concur that due to this trend, we are lossing our culture and tradition. However, I quibble from them and propound that it has a positive as well as a negative situation. In this essay, I will cite light on the trend of similarity and also discuss some reasons before a logical conclusion is reached.
Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of following different culture and tradition. The top-notch concrete reason is that we can learn about various cultural and become familiar with it. To uphold my notion, I qoute an instance of TV channels like discover which gives bundle of knowledge about different domains and people's lifestyle. In addition, another rationale reason which hauls me to petron is that economy development of nations. For example, if people use variety of similar products, then it invite multinational companies which provides employment and it can lead to growth of economic development. Moreover, the rear most coherent factor which cannot be neglected is that people can enjoy various food, music, and also buy clothes which famous around the world. Such as McDonald's and Domino's, Nike and Levi's and many more things.
What is half for some, may appear half empty to others. So public in general tend to distinguish that because of this trend we can loss our culture and people become materialistic which has multifarious reasons. To commence with, some people deem that if we use western products then it may lead to reduce in our cultural items use. For example, due to wearing jeans, we have been forgotten our tradition clothes. They also uphold that people give less priority to their own national language. Such as, today English language become worldwild famous and public not like to speak in national language.
All in All, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting globalisation. It's merit s have an edge over it's demerits. However, it's contrary can be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-20 | ng duc minh | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-16 | ojehparvaz | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | dantesw | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-11 | rajveerbooh2000@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-21 | Piyush Somani | 61 | view |
- Some people think that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or they are most interested in Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 78
- In some countries children have strict rules of behavior in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they like To what extent should children have to follow rules 80
- Professionals like doctors teachers and lawyers contribute equally to society with non professionals including entertainers and sportspeople Thus they should receive equal pay Do you agree or disagree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'invites'?
Suggestion: invites
...se variety of similar products, then it invite multinational companies which provides ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, then, well, for example, in addition, in general, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08831908832 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70589285704 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595441595442 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1329464774 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.55 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133007437077 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369379857872 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331218928144 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765650755715 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015141915903 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.