Due to the trend of globalization, the ties in a range of areas such as politics, economy and culture between different countries have been strengthened than ever before. For the sake of mutual development, many developed countries are taking efforts in helping poor countries. Personally speaking, I agree that aids for undeveloped countries are essential but financial aid is not the best way to help.
Due to the trend of globalization, the ties in a range of areas such as politics, economy and culture between different countries have been strengthened than ever before. For the sake of mutual development, many developed countries are taking efforts in helping poor countries. Personally speaking, I agree that aids for undeveloped countries are essential but financial aid is not the best way to help.
To begin with, it has been proved by many cases that just providing financial aid cannot truly help poor countries to get rid of poverty because money may not go to the people who need it most. For instance, due to imperfect local legal system, in many cases, corrupt politicians become rich while their citizens continue to suffer in poverty even with a large amount of financial aid. Furthermore, governments in poor areas may misuse the money they are given because they lack resources. Therefore, it is a bad idea to simply give money to governments of poor countries.
On the other hand, statistic indicates that more than 9 hundred millions people in the world are still in hunger. International aid is crucial for those who suffering from poverty, hunger and shortage of water. Aids from developed countries optimize the living standards and reduce poverty in poor countries. Besides simply giving money, there are other means of aids can effectively improve the economy of poor countries. For example, some multi-national companies from developed countries invest in factories in poor areas, this could increase employment opportunities and help the domestic economy to develop. Plus, developed countries can also benefit from such investing by reducing the producing costs by transferring their production lines to less-developed areas.
In conclusion, from both moral and economic perspective, developed countries should help other countries to develop. Investment would be more effective than simply providing financial aid.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-09 | goodluck0101 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals suffer, while others are in favor of them 73
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small number of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss and give 89
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- More and more people are working at home rather than in the workplaces ,Some people say this will bring benefits to the workers and their families, but others think it will bring stress to the home.Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in many cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40655737705 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89247603787 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583606557377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.699202343 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.933333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2666666667 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369770370158 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13124225224 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.186698608977 0.0667982634062 279% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268265254166 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.252073548562 0.056905535591 443% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.