Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main sources of energy. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged.
Do you think this a positive or negative development?
In the contemporary world, fossil fuels contribute to the majority of energy resource. While technological advancements made it possible to use renewable resources substitute for fossil fuels. It is a positively development due to several reasons and I am going to explain in detail in this essay.
Firstly, according to statistics given by Rystad Energy which is a Norway energy consulting company, 2017 was the recorded the lowest year for discovered oil reserves globally. As fossil fuels lack sustainability, it is true that we are on the verge of running out of fossil fuels. Therefore, we are in an urgent need of using renewable in order to develop sustainably. The utilization of renewable resources can alleviate the shortage of fossil fuels. Secondly, alternative energy such as solar, wind power and nuclear power are more environmental-friendly. It is acknowledged that a large amount of emissions and exhaust gases are produced in the progress of utilizing fossil fuels, which would lead to tremendous damage to the environment. Renewable source like nuclear power could help to reduce carbon emissions that cause global warming. Thus, environmental problems can be released by using alternative sources. Furthermore, the conflicts between countries can be eased to some extent with the development of renewable sources. It is acknowledged that plenty of wars and conflicts between different counties are caused by competition for petroleum and gas sources. Consequently, using alternative sources could reduce the dependence of fossil fuels for countries lack these natural sources.
In conclusion, I believe that the use of alternative sources is a positively development. It should be the global priority to invest in such research and development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-30 | Phạm Phú Trường | 89 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | miavu27 | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-10 | hoathubanh | 61 | view |
| 2018-09-07 | lelong95 | 61 | view |
| 2018-09-02 | Ajayvir | 84 | view |
- Due to the trend of globalization, the ties in a range of areas such as politics, economy and culture between different countries have been strengthened than ever before. For the sake of mutual development, many developed countries are taking efforts in h 73
- Today ,the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the level of violent crimes in the society To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small number of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss and give 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('positively') instead an adjective, or a noun ('development') instead of another adjective.
...rces substitute for fossil fuels. It is a positively development due to several reasons and I am going t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istics given by Rystad Energy which is a Norway energy consulting company, 2017 w...
^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('positively') instead an adjective, or a noun ('development') instead of another adjective.
... that the use of alternative sources is a positively development. It should be the global priority to in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51838235294 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29097925275 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3637928191 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28880349778 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919395771827 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716469704727 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190446240348 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256401781568 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.