Early technological developments brought more benefits and changes to people’s lives than recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the prevalence of advanced technologies has fundamentally transformed the whole world. While some people opine that early technological developments have far more beneficial effects on people’s lives than the recent ones, I completely disagree with this point of view, because both of those have equal significant impact on our lives.
On the one hand, many early technological devices have helped people and changed the way we live. The invention of printing, for example, has had a profound impact on the way we impart knowledge to the next generation. The printing press allows books and newsletters to be mass-produced, which means that more individuals can gain access to these information sources. The telephone is another early scientific breakthrough that has revolutionized and facilitated current methods of communication. From this, people can interact with each other in a far-flung place regardless of the geographical barrier. Finally, technological advances have led to new forms of transport, such as cars, trains and planes, which have completely changed the way we commute from home to the workplace and trade goods.
On the other hand, I contend that recently cutting-edge technology also ushers in some merits to our life. Firstly, the presence of computer and the Internet enables individuals to shop online a wide range of applications, which makes human life definitely more convenient. With only a click of the mouse, it is possible to purchase merchandise such as clothes and daily necessities without even leaving our comfortable home. In addition, as to space technology, the advent of space shuttles assists astronauts in carrying out space exploration programmes, which can broaden human’s horizons about not only terrestrial planets but also extraterrestrial lives on earth, such as supernovas or black holes.
In conclusion, while people can reap a variety of powerful effects from the early technological advancements, I do not believe that they can totally outweigh the recent ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | lauranguyen_97 | 89 | view |
- The bar chart below gives information about the water use in China, USA, Russia and Australia in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- News is playing a vital role in our life today and people are getting much influenced by the news now. Some say that news has no connection with most people's life and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspaper and watch television news p 84
- In many parts of the world, children and teenagers are committing more crimes. Why is this case happening? How should children or teenagers be punished? 84
- The professional workers such as doctors, nurses and teachers should be paid more than sports and entertainment stars or personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people say that to solve today’s global program every nation should have a good relationship with other nations. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What do you think about cooperation and communication between countries? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...in access to these information sources. The telephone is another early scientific b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, so, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49050632911 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18833314983 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613924050633 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7133406947 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.461538462 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256071133179 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819175949227 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083733312893 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164204978446 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779837025057 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.