The environmental problems facing today’s world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Governments and large companies should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
At this moment in time, in contemporary cities, damages done to the environment are getting out of control and are proning both people’s health and living conditions into many severe circumstances. Responding to this situation, many people say that there was little ordinary people could do and big organizations such as governments and large firms should shoulder the responsibility. I do not entirely agree with this statement. In this essay I plan to make myself clear with suitable examples.
Firstly, Earth’s population is now so massive that each individual’s act toward nature matters. To cite an example, millions of people commuting to work on private conveyances daily, discharging trillions of tons of poisonous exhaust gas into the atmosphere, causing catastrophic air pollution. Subsequencely, the environment is severely damaged by one small regular transaction that many of us take part in.
Moreover, instead of carrying out theorical research, many ordinary people get to experience the horrifying reality of environment-related issues. Those people are capable of providing scientists and agencies with reliable information and suggesting feasible solutions to problems around themselves. A prominent example is Morgan Vague. She is a biology major whose hometown is Houston, Texas - one of the most polluted city in the USA. Growing up in such conditions inspires her to carry out studies on bacterias’ ability to consume plastics as food.
However, I do think that large firms and governments should play a bigger role in the process of reducing the amount of damage done to nature. Big companies should invest more in researching and putting out eco-friendly products, while the government should fund ecological study programs and reduce tax on certain environmentally-friendly products to encourage citizens to consume them. Furthermore, restrictions should be placed so that the general public are more concious about their act toward nature.
In conclusion, although the general public has impressive contribution on solving environment issues, influencing organizations should show larger consensus in saving our planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-26 | claraa_ltn | 89 | view |
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in London in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The plans show changes to the layout of a theater between 2010 and 2012 73
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 73
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people from using cars 84
- Computers are increasingly used in education in which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 444, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...strictions should be placed so that the general public are more concious about their act towar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...d nature. In conclusion, although the general public has impressive contribution on solving ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68111455108 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32997516025 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66253869969 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7472122113 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.6875 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1875 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250713168374 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641374383255 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646938568564 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111241944884 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074798973872 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.