Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that politicians play an indispensable role to environmental protection, not individuals because they assume that every single person could not create a huge success. While I strongly agree with this first view, but I believe that several person also protect environment as well.
In the one hand, politicians are a crucial factor in protecting environment based on two major reasons. Firstly, politicians give numerous methods to reinforce environmental problems. As far as I know, every country always give an important method including inhibit deforestation or throw trash wherever. For instance, most countries in the world build underground instead of other vehicles in order to evaluate peak hours, even inhabitant move on foot or by bike. Moreover, they even restrain using plastic bag because it really difficult to recycle. For example, in several stories in Japan, if they want to plastic bag, they will pay money. Thus, they would not suffer from respiratory diseases or pollution related to environment. Secondly, governments would make the law strictly. Currently, politicians fulfill heavy punishments to people destroying the environment. According to the newest report in Vietnam, they increase the penalty up to 20 billion VNĐ to the violator such as illegal hunting animals or deforestation.
In the other hand, I also assume that building relationship between individuals and environment is an important. Inhabitants should have a good awareness to prevent them from demolishing environment. For instance, parent train kids about environmental protection when they were child. Hence, they have a right attitude. Moreover, they organize events by their own to propagate about the importance of environment. Especially, there are majority events involved in environment that helping upgrade their awareness in every year. Even they create world environment day so as to remind them about environmental benefits.
In conclusion, although I encourage first view, but I assume that environmental protection need to be combined between two factors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-18 | Ngoc Anh 97 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | TrucNgoc | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | TrucNgoc | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | TrucNgoc | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | Ngoc Khanh Ong | 84 | view |
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these view and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hungry and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should ne stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- “ Failure is proof that the desire wasn’t strong enough”. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 40
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun person seems to be countable; consider using: 'several people', 'several persons'.
Suggestion: several people; several persons
...ith this first view, but I believe that several person also protect environment as well. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
... between individuals and environment is an important. Inhabitants should have a good awarene...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... Even they create world environment day so as to remind them about environmental benefit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eed to be combined between two factors.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60634920635 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10487875912 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9385842368 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.3 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.65 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101246234466 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311056208905 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288002491962 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729561292748 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261577397918 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.