Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can the government do to address these problems? What can individual people do?
Humans are in charge of solving various environment issue because our behavior has a negative effect on the planet. This essay will discuss the reasons for environmental problems and the measures that governments and individuals should take to tackle these problems.
There are two major causes of the damaging environment. Firstly, a great amount of gas emission from factories and exhaust fumes from vehicles is released, which is a tendency of the greenhouse. Secondly, an increasing number of the population has an impact on the earth. People disposal of household waste, which pollutes oceans and rivers.
Governments need to take responsibilities to reduce air pollution. If they introduced laws to limit emissions, the level of air contamination would be increasing. Furthermore, imposing a green tax on drivers and companies that seem to be a good measure. As a result, people would use more public transport system or walk instead of driving, which would constraint amount of exhaust fumes and reducing emissions. As a good example of this is that in 2018, the authorities’ Singapore released carbon tax of 5% per tonne of greenhouse gas emissions, which made this country become one of the cleanest on earth. In addition, they could encourage companies to use renewable resources, such as wind, wave, and nuclear power,… that is infinite and a friendly environment.
There is a need for individuals to take part in protecting the environment. They could take public transport or walk rather than drive, opt for products with less packing and use recycling goods. It is necessary for residents to buy more local food in order to decrease food miles. In this way, waste could be reduced by reusing and recycling, consequently, the ecology would be preserved.
In conclusion, I believe that both governments and individuals must play their role in saving the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-16 | zoeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee | 84 | view |
- In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 78
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life, but city life can be extremely difficult. Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city. How can governments make urban life better for everyone? 78
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 78
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can the government do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 724, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...s, such as wind, wave, and nuclear power,… that is infinite and a friendly environ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24422442244 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0542303337 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587458745875 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6412834793 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4705882353 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133593803948 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427638156155 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428150459589 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809997241662 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330535990389 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.