The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.
The first pie chart gives the percentages of energy used by Australian households. The second chart compared the greenhouse gas emission which results from this energy use.
Overall, in the first chart, a clear majority accounts for heating, while cooling only contributes a negligible share. The data also indicate that water heating dominates in the second chart, whereas the figures for cooling is the least impressive.
Accounting for 42% of the overall students, the heating had the largest proportion compared to the others. The subsequent ranks belong to the figures for water heating and other appliances. The first one constitutes 30%, which is 15 percentage points higher than the statistics for the second. Only 7%,4%,2% were the proportion of refrigeration, lighting, cooling.
Regarding Australian household greenhouse gas emissions, the chart recorded a proportion of 32% in water heating, which had the largest proportion compared to the others. It was followed by that of other appliances and heating. While the former made up 28%, the latter was only 13% less. Only 14%, 8%, 3% were the percentage of refrigeration, lighting, cooling.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | CharanpreetSingh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | sana_em | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | AlisherBabajonov | 73 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make? Has this been a positive or negative development? 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What can the government do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 84
- Some people regard videos game as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool. Others, however believe that videos game are having an adverse effected on the people who play them. In your opinion, do the drawback of video games outweigh the benefit 67
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, regarding, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41666666667 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87377993436 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3505050464 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.25 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 22.9334400587 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281359670594 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110929672992 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.174536167862 0.0843802449381 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215952507977 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.233404677765 0.0819641961636 285% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.56 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.