Fewer young people choose to work in farming. What are the reasons? Should young people be encouraged to do farming work?
There is a growing concern that the young are avoiding farming work. There are several causes of the development. In my opinion, young people should definately be motivated to work on farms.
The depiction of farmers on media and attatchment of farmers to porvety and difficulties may have negative impacts on the young people. The first point of view is that young people may not engage in farming job because they assume that agricultural work is physically demanding and less appealing than other trendy jobs. Throughout the history, farming is attatched to the images of cattle, and people manually accumulating their crops. However, this thinking does not reflect the reality of modern agriculture anymore. Farmers nowadays are harnessing technology such as state-of-the-art irrigation system, automated tractors, and robots to collect their crops. In addition, mass media and social platforms ofen favor certain jobs to others which may distort the fact that farming is also an important profession. To illustrate, jobs in technology, finance and health sectors normally appear as extravagant and lucrative on media, which may be more appealing to young job seekers than labor-intensive work on farms. Finally, some young minds may think that farming work tends to provide people with less income than other industry. Given the increasing connections of nations and regions through upgraded transportation systems, agricultural products are now able to be sold globally, which brings more money for farmers. Thus, farming is an honorable work and can produce a large income for people.
There are many benefits associated with working on farms for the young. This includes merits for themselves and their community. First, the lack of human resources in the agricultural sector implies that employers would pay a higher salary for those working on farms. This stems from the fact that many young people in developed nations have left their hometown to pursue academic career or better employment. Secondly, with growing number workers choose to work on farms, they are likely to manufature more crops and agricultural goods which are fundamental to feed growing population in where they live as well as other countries. More importantly, young people tend to be good at technology which is of importance in order to enhance productivity and efficiency in farming work. Thus, the involment of young workers in agriculture is crucial for the security of food industry as well as beneficial for these people.
In sum, the negative images of farmers on media and from assumption of people may be the reasons behind the phennomenon. It is necessary for the young generations to take part in farming activities since it is fundamental for the development of the industry and generate decent income for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-22 | uyenmia | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-22 | hinhin411 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | phuong_anh_07 | 58 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | thaoduong1902 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
- Giving detailed descriptions of crimes in newspapers and on TV can have negative consequences so this kind of information should be restricted in the media To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Art classes should be compulsory in high school Do you agree or disagree 74
- If a product is good or it meets people s needs people will buy it So advertising is unnecessary and no more than entertainment Agree or disagree 89
- In some cities public parks and open spaces are changed into gardens where local residents can grow their own fruit and vegetables Do you think the benefits outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in addition, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2364.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 447.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28859060403 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82809267764 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514541387025 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3310083035 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.454545455 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3181818182 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386461119792 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12686298074 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113206384592 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283107527232 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100407344612 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.