Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession. Is this a positive or negative development?
Public figures from film and other industries share their opinion regarding public matters even though they possess marginal knowledge about them. In my opinion this is a positive development considering various benefits it may bring to the society.
One of the key benefits from the celebrity involvement in the public matters is that it helps to bring the public attention on pressing problems which require immediate attention of the society. In other words, with the proliferation of the social media platforms, celebrities are able to reach a massive audience almost instantly compared to other information sharing methods such as news on TV or newspapers. Moreover, celebrity endorsement has also proven to be a successful mean for influencing a large number of people.
Moreover, celebrities and stars are able to raise their voice for good against any level of individual or any powerful party, regardless of their power or wealth. In other words, they can stand against corruptions or wrong deeds by political figures, large companies or even the government. This is because being in the public eye means celebrities often get the protection as no one will attempt to stop them through any means of violence. Had any general member of the society tried to stand against a political figure, more often than not, he or she could have been eliminated by violence.
In conclusion, famous figures sharing their point of view on public matters can be seen as a positive trend because they are able to effectively reach out a large audience which could not have been possible otherwise and also because they can stand against unfair situations without being threatened by powerful bodies. However, general public should be careful and should not heavily depend on opinions coming from non-official sources such as film stars.
- Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Young people are often influenced by their peers Do the advantages of peer pressure outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others contest those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit What is your position Discuss bot 61
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in an effort to deal with the health issues involved Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in the 73
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of areas such as fashion and consumer goods To what extent do you agree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...to be a successful mean for influencing a large number of people. Moreover, celebrities and st...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nfluencing a large number of people. Moreover, celebrities and stars are able to rais...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...threatened by powerful bodies. However, general public should be careful and should not heavil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20608108108 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72432021865 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557432432432 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8689028525 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.090909091 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279017771282 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930275296238 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565478608572 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165540770856 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424226837814 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.