Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession.
Is this a positive or negative development?
Public figures like actors and influencers always express their opinion on social matters which would be less with their livelihood. However, this essay explains the negative development towards the society with the facts of misleading and underestimation.
Celebrities views regarding the public facts would make a viral and the fans and followers might support them irrespective of the reality. Sometimes, due to this fact, many unnoticed social problems went on to a higher level and the solutions would be much easier than in the past. Public figures have a major influence not only on society but also on the authorised level. Even in democratic countries, they could use their position to make some legislation over social issues. For instance, during pandemics, many actors post their vaccination photos and their experience over social media attract many youngsters and the public to approach vaccination.
Nevertheless, celebrities illiteracy towards certain problems would make a detrimental effect on society. To emphasise, despite the knowledge of real issues some sort of views makes controversy in public. Fans constantly relay them even if it is good or bad and would make confusion on the facts. For instance, flooding and landslides frequently occurred due to human acts. However, many actors oppose that opinion and open up other problems to diminish the real hazards of farmland. Similarly, some public figures have an interest in political parties or groups and they would share their views only even though it is harmful to the nation. Their perspectives to the parties would be mixed with the public problems makes them more crucial as a whole.
To conclude, stars concern over public problems would be a great impact in some situations. Though, the lack of knowledge other than their professional issues would make pernicious effects on society.
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples 73
- it is crucial for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares and parks do you agree or disagree with the statement 78
- The charts below compare five different countries showing the electricity used measured in megawatts or mw in a typical hospital during one week and also the number of emergency medical calls made by local residents during the same week The last chart sho 84
- The chart shows the source of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 73
- The chart below gives information on the numbers of workers in different occupations who migrated to Australia between 2009 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d be a great impact in some situations. Though, the lack of knowledge other than their...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, similarly, so, for instance, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36610169492 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7658690497 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1841435797 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.9375 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254928285825 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826388731224 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611561570217 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170003604204 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619198209777 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.