The first man to walk on the moon claimed it was a step forward for mankind. However, it has made little difference in most people’s live. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
When Lance Armstrong put his footstep on the moon, he contended that this milestone will change the way people live their ordinary life. However, a majority of residents argue that this groundbreaking accomplishment did not contribute to better life. From my perspective, I agree with those who hold the view that is so-called achievement did not influence positively on day-to-day lives.
On the first hand, there are some convincing justifications behind the confidence of the first moon walker, chief of which is that the step forward opened a door to the finding of other inhabitable planets. As a matter of fact, the world population is witnessing a dramatic increase, if this trend continues, the whole humanity may be confronted with the situation where people have to struggle and go to war for the place of living. Nevertheless, the first human settlement on the moon stated that thanks to the technological breakthrough of transport and energy, human can travel vast distance in space. Therefore, if people run out of living space, they totally can relocate on another planet and start a new civilization. This prospect might be the explanation behind the optimism of the man who was given credit for the first conquering the moon.
On the other hand, I lean toward the argument held by the majority that this step forward did not make eminent impact on the way we live our normal life. In fact, a large proportion of citizens do not have access to education and medical healthcare. Furthermore, the sum of money which should have been used to mitigate the social issues, was allocated to the launch of manned spacecraft. As a result, from a popular perspective, this allocation of resources was wasteful because they think that space discovery was nothing more than an arena of global competition between superpowers in the world.
To sum up, while the thought of the first astronaut exploring the Moon is understandable, I wholeheartedly approve that this so-called advancement seem not to have any clear positive benefits to the daily life.
- Many people feel it is a waste of money to try to save endangered animal species for example the tiger or the blue whale To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 73
- Since travelling abroad became relatively inexpensive more countries opened their doors for foreign tourists Is it a positive or negative trend Give your opinion and include relevant examples 89
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems in to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Scientist predict it in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, in fact, as a matter of fact, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05588235294 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94890015272 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597058823529 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.450904873 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.230769231 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1538461538 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5384615385 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184991310251 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060702358401 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393121776292 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966258682807 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508950387407 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.