Foreign tourist abroad should be charged more than local people when visiting the local historical and cultural tourist attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a common belief that the ticket price of local historical and cultural tourist destinations should be higher among international visitors compared to native residents. I, personally, believe this view is unreasonable.
The argument in favor of increasing prices for foreign tourists would be that those historical and cultural sites are dependent on the state subsidies to keep them operating, which locals have already contributed to through the domestic tax system. However, it is a shortsighted view. This is because foreign visitors also financially support the economy of the host country by their various expenditure on purchasing souvenirs, making use of services, including accommodation and transportation, for instance. In turn, the authorities and inhabitants in every country should be willing to subsidize their heritages to promote the attention from people from the rest of the world and encourage them to pay a visit.
Additionally, if holiday-makers realize that they would be charged more when visiting historical and cultural places in a particular country, they will be likely to change their destinations, which may trigger adverse impacts on this country’s tourism industry. Danang, a province having increasing-popularity tourism, would serve as an excellent example as its landscapes such as Ba Na Hill and Dragon Bridge charge the same price regardless of nationality. Thanks to this, both national and international tourists flock to this area on a yearly basic and an image of a friendly Danang are more fostered. If oversea tourists halt their coming due to costly prices, there would be a risk of lacking fund for maintenance and a large number of labors would be put in the brink of joblessness.
In conclusion, it seems to me that every effort should be made to appeal to foreign visitors and it is counter-productive to force them to pay more than local residents when visiting one specific site.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-20 | Diem Hang 1612 | 89 | view |
- In modern societies, it is possible for people to go shopping, work andcommunicateviatheinternetwithoutface-to-facecommunication.Isitapositiveornegativedevelopment 89
- The pie charts below show information on the highest level of education of women in Someland in 1945 and 1975 78
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Somepeoplethinksecondaryschoolstudentsshouldlearninternationalnewsasoneoftheirsubjects,whileothersbelievethatthisisawasteofvaluabletime.Discussbothviewsandgiveyourownopinion 11
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 716, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orld and encourage them to pay a visit. Additionally, if holiday-makers realize ...
^^^
Line 3, column 731, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...isk of lacking fund for maintenance and a large number of labors would be put in the brink of job...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35179153094 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24299124617 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605863192182 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.3294490591 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.363636364 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2886360641 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951907649049 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803014833069 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182286585549 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241214615865 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.