Some people hold that we should spend amount of time and money on the protection of wild animals. Some people argue that they should be spent on human populations. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Whether we should allocate resources on wild animals or human population is a debatable issue. I, personally, believe these two concerns are of equivalent significance and thus, should be equally invested.
On the one hand, there are little doubts that giving financial support to preserve wild animals is plausible to various perspectives. It is undeniable that by saving them, humans are saving ourselves. Wild animals, for instance, play an indispensable part in the success of many medical-breakthroughs, which is key to develop vaccinations, keeping the lives of millions of patients. More importantly, humans, fauna and flora and all other living forms are creating the ecology diversity. If a certain species of animal becomes scarce or extinct, this, in turn, will reduce the population of another kind of animal that preys on them, which is prone to disrupt the ecological balance, eventually posing threats on the survival of human beings.
Nonetheless, there are good grounds for arguing that the immediate requirements of the human population are hardly underestimated. If money is not available to people who encounter problems such as mental illness, physical disabilities, or leading deprived living standard, it is inevitable that animals should receive less. However, there should be solutions that balance the necessities of human and the demand for wildlife conservation. Furthermore, by investing in education, we could make the world a better place for both human and animals. The public needs to be aware of the consequences they are causing to nature, for example, a massive extinction or rare animals will not happen if illegal hunting is under control.
In conclusion, resources should be allocated on both wild animals and human population due to distinct benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-20 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that an international car-free day is an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- We can get knowledge from news, but some people think we cannot trust the journalist. What do you think? What qualities do you think a successful journalist should have? 89
- Some people think that robots are very important for humans' future development. Others, however, think that robots are a dangerous invention that could have negative effects on society. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Men and women are different in terms of their characteristics and abilities. For this reason,some jobs are better done by men and others by women.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and thus, should be equally invested. On the one hand, there are little doubts...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44086021505 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1232728941 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.155230509 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192436149343 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692622250505 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047661280349 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130416043152 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497027839387 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.