Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is often argued that foriegn tourists should pay more than locals when they visit cultural and historical sites. I fully agree with this view and consider that it is the optimal way to the contribute to the budget of local tourism.
First of all, I think that cultural and historical places in the countries with low need to be renovated at a regular basis since the budget of some of them is not supported by the government. That's why they should charge foreigners much more than locals in order to offer better service to visitors. For example, in 2012, African country Egypt decided to remove the tourism of Giza region that is considered the world-wide heritage from the list of government-supported sectors of economy and it leads the historial place dependent from the foreign tourism and investments.
Secondly, as a rule, local people are supposed to pay through taxes and it helps the government to contribute to the local local tourism. So, the government should even ensureba free-entry for local visitors to museums, historial buildings and etc. For instance, according to the regulations of the ministry of tourism of Azerbaijan, the main cultural and historical places are free for children and the tickets for adults with Azerbaijani citizenship should not be more than 1 euro.
To conclude, I strongly believe that foreign tourists should pay more than locals for cultural and historical places because it contributes to improving and development of the local tourism in a great way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-02 | quang1944 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-27 | Cggcgfhjghfj | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-27 | Cggcgfhjghfj | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | qaengx12 | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | HaleyLin2000 | 78 | view |
- The two maps below show the changes in town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at leas 61
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... consider that it is the optimal way to the contribute to the budget of local tourism. First ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...hem is not supported by the government. Thats why they should charge foreigners much ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: local
...lps the government to contribute to the local local tourism. So, the government should even...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...isitors to museums, historial buildings and etc. For instance, according to the regulati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th Azerbaijani citizenship should not be more than 1 euro. To conclude, I stro...
^^
Line 4, column 192, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a great way" with adverb for "great"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ng and development of the local tourism in a great way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04819277108 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83824668833 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.4708432141 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.666666667 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359978677308 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156709740007 0.084324248473 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722690468874 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242948032001 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598090771893 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.