? Full-time university students spend most of their time in class or working on assignments. However, some people think that it is important for students to get involved in non-academic activities on campus as well (for example, to join a sports team or take part in drama).
?To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this fast-changing world the ways of educating have become one of the most debatable issues among people. I although accepted that educators should provide several academic courses for students, I think non-academic programs have an array of benefits that have been overlooked.
Academic activities have some advantages which develop student’s abilities. First, educators plan and provide instructive courses training students and making them ready for their career prospective. In other words, students would acquire applied skills and theoretical knowledge which can foster learner productivity. Take the principles of management course, one of the remarkable disciplines, as an example. This knowledge could raise the chance of students to be employed in a well-paid job due to its exhaustive applications. Moreover, doing home works drive students to learn the trained courses more effectively because in this way students are more likely to diagnose their defects and solve them.
Although academic activities have some benefits, from my perspective, the effects of non-academic activities are more significant. Non-academic programs not only give rise to individuals' scientific flourishment but also enhance student’s morality and ingenuity. Due to multi-objective characteristics of a human, students need some non-academic activities, including musical and artistic exercises to improve learners learning power. As an example, playing an instrument like the piano could boost perception power and make students excel at solving mathematical problems and also increase the student’s mental discipline.
For the reasons mentioned above, I believe both academic and non-academic activities have some advantages; however, educators should not underestimate non-educational programs' merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-25 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-25 | fatemeh norouzi | 71 | view |
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 78
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 67
- the bar chart shows the average number of hours per week that men and women spend doing activities around the home 69
- The line graph depicts records about the average amount of carbon dioixde released per person in the U K Sweden Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007 over a 40 year period 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to power'
Suggestion: to power
... exercises to improve learners learning power. As an example, playing an instrument l...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, i think, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.16535433071 5.12529762239 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23252082722 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.641732283465 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2084242206 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.461538462 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253627136314 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936378066503 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427474506078 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153999758699 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037818550187 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.51 12.4159519038 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.