Full-time university students spend most of their time in class or working on assignments. However, some people think that it is important for students to get involved in non-academic activities on campus as well (for example, to join a sports team or take part in drama).
?To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this fast-changing world the ways of educating have become one of the most debatable issues among people. I although accepted that educators should provide several academic courses for students, I think non-academic programs have an array of benefits that have been overlooked.
Academic activities have some advantages which develop student’s abilities. First, educators plan and provide instructive courses training students and making them ready for their career prospective. In other words, students would acquire applied skills and theoretical knowledge which can foster learner productivity. Take the principles of management course, one of the remarkable disciplines, as an example. This knowledge could raise the chance of students to be employed in a well-paid job due to its exhaustive applications. Moreover, doing home works drive students to learn the trained courses more effectively because in this way students are more likely to diagnose their defects and solve them.
Although academic activities have some benefits, from my perspective, the effects of non-academic activities are more significant. Non-academic programs not only give rise to individuals' scientific flourishment but also enhance student’s morality and ingenuity. Due to multi-objective characteristics of students, they need some non-academic activities, including musical and artistic exercises to improve learning ability. Indeed, these kinds of activities lay the ground for students' brains to take in more contents and work more efficiently. As an example, playing an instrument like the piano could boost perception power and make students excel at solving mathematical problems and also increase the student’s mental discipline.
For the reasons mentioned above, I believe both academic and non-academic activities have certain advantages required for a well-round training system; however, educators should not underestimate non-educational programs' merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-25 | fatemeh norouzi | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-25 | fatemeh norouzi | 71 | view |
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The line graph depicts records about the average amount of carbon dioixde released per person in the U K Sweden Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007 over a 40 year period 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 78
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, i think, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.10791366906 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20164092807 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625899280576 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5969489651 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270977323002 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965642339752 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471489746934 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166534323172 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449958746008 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.