Many people in today’s society enjoy watching movies or TV programs about crime.
What makes them so appealing to people? What is the impact of this on individuals and society?
Many people in today’s society enjoy watching movies or TV programs about crime.
What makes them so appealing to people? What is the impact of this on individuals and society?
In our own time, crime gender has received wide currency among people; however, they do not suit all range of people, particularly, children. Some reasons make these movies and Tv programs in vogue.
The compelling characteristics of movies about crime are the main reasons that male them popular in societies. Indeed, the adventure and action traits are involved in this kind of film are the most significant factors pursuing people, in particular teenagers to watch them. These movies are in harmony with teenagers due to their junior power. Take Lost movie, one of the most renowned action films in the world, as an example. This movie has been sold for around one million dollars and adolescents have had over 70% share in this number. Furthermore, some people believe that crime movies could enhance society’s safety because these movies not only would acquaint people about the ways that criminals could fraud but also could maintain people’s security and teach them useful and practical techniques to defend themselves in the face of dangers.
From my perspective, there are both negative and positive impacts associated with Tv shows related to crime. The most considerable disadvantage is that these shows may not be appropriate for all people due to the strain and violence they contain. Although they may seem attractive and entertaining, the distressing pictures could affect some people, especially children. Consequently, some limited restrictions should be intended to prevent dire consequences. Contrary, these shows could cope with crime occurrence and inform people about the ways that they may be deceived by fraudsters.
To sum up, several reasons have made crime movies and the shows appealing to people and it could be argued that these shows have benefits and drawbacks which heavily depend upon the audience.
Fatemeh Norouzi
Task2 academic
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-06 | fatemeh norouzi | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-27 | x | 50 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people life has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 89
- The line graph depicts records about the average amount of carbon dioixde released per person in the U K Sweden Italy and Portugal from 1967 to 2007 over a 40 year period 73
- In this fast changing world distance learning and working have become one of the most challengeable issues Although I accepted the positive points of this trend I believe negative effects are more significant 56
- the bar chart shows the average number of hours per week that men and women spend doing activities around the home 69
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd upon the audience. Fatemeh Norouzi Task2 academic
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, in particular, kind of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34662576687 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66986259647 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592024539877 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8549910073 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425376992474 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146978596358 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183493518621 0.0667982634062 275% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306267321083 0.151304729494 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.25372610065 0.056905535591 446% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.