In the future, it seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets, such as Mars. To what extent do you disagree or agree with this statement?
There are a lot of warnings that it seems more difficult to live on Earth in the future because the Earth definitely will change by many effects, such as human activities, natural disasters, the sun's radiation, etc. Some people think more money should be spent searching for other planets to live, such as Mars. I strongly accept that idea because I want our future generations can have a chance to live in a quality environment.
There are three main reasons why I agree with them. If you often read the news or watch television, you can see they are mostly talking about how bad is the Earth’s condition right now. The first reason to make earth difficult to live is human activities. We have released a huge amount of plastics into the Earth’s surface and created pollution just from daily life activities. For example, if you use one plastic bag for shopping each day, you are releasing 365 plastic bags into the environment in one year. Because plastics need hundreds to thousands of years to decompose. It changes the soil chemistry, makes it stinky, and hard for us to plant trees Moreover, plastics also dumped to oceans and rivers, killed a lot of fish, turtles and water resources, and caused water pollution. Furthermore, we also accidentally make our planet become worse by burning fuels, using vehicles. Those are releasing huge amounts of carbon dioxide into the air and cause air pollution. But we don’t have enough oxygen from the tree because of deforestation, which is the second reason Earth becomes difficult to live. Deforestation can cause global warming as well. When the greenhouse effect increases, it raises up solar radiation absorption. Then it could lead to the rise in global temperature. The last reason is the Sun also affects global warming, some of the scientists said the Sun keeps bigger in time and it will eat our planet in the next fifty million years.
Although I agree that we should spend money and time on researching new planets, however, it will take a lot of time and we don’t know when it is finished. So that, nowadays, a lot of international associations start to work together to let people and all the governments know the condition of our planet, how important are our planet and we have to protect the Earth. They divided into small groups and go to the beach or any places, where a lot of trash, to clean. Moreover, they spread out to everyone stop throw litter and no more plastics in the environment, such as the Taiwanese government notice that they will ban the straw plastics in all coffee shops or restaurants.
In conclusion, although I agree that some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets, we also need to save the Earth as much as we can.
- My dream jobs 56
- Nowadays, many people think that we should spend our youth traveling around the world. While other millennials and older generations believe that we should invest more time in studying and working, we can save the traveling and life-enjoying activities wh 56
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets, such as Mars. To what extent do you disagree or agree with this statement? 56
- Nowadays more and more young people hold the important positions in the government Some people think that is a good thing while others argue that it is not suitable Discuss both views and give your own opinions 74
- My dream jobs 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'suns'' or 'sun's'?
Suggestion: suns'; sun's
...uman activities, natural disasters, the suns radiation, etc. Some people think more ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... bags into the environment in one year. Because plastics need hundreds to thousands of ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1360, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...is the Sun also affects global warming, some of the scientists said the Sun keeps bigger in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 476.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80462184874 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66704059518 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533613445378 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 703.8 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2246817944 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.954545455 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25776906417 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733849430199 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116422409043 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21860555231 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129297284627 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.