The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming wider, the rich more richer, the poor even more poorer. What problems can the situation cause and give the solutions?
In this day and age, the gap between the affluent and the needy people has increasingly widened. Such situation can be found not only between the developed and developing countries, but also among people of the same country. There are several reasons for such a situation. However, some primitives steps can be taken to overcome the issue. Both the causes and remedies are analysed further.
Discussing the reasons of inequal financial condition, many examples can be put forward. The foremost one is astronomically high corruption rate of the countries. Explaining it, in the states, where citizens are committing offence like corruption, financial gap can not be decline. Wealthy people prefer to do work with the help of money. Because of it, poor people can not get any opportunities to go ahead in their carrier. Furthermore, unexcepted scale of population play major role to make more gap between the rich and the poor. What I mean, it is really tough for government to handle every problems of their citizens. Because of lack of management for big crowd, the rich people can be more richer and poor people can be more poor. Additionally, lack of education is also a cause of the same. People can not be rich because they can not get opportunity to study well and not get any appropriate job to survive.
However, some remedies could be taken to tackle the situation. The foremost one is government should be taken heavy taxes from wealthy family. It will helpful for government to distribute good facilities to poor people like free education. Additionally, high penalties should be there against people who try to do fraud in paying taxes. Moreover, government should give more opportunities to do job. They have to big free seminal for becoming self depended for survive. Self employment should be get by mankind.
In conclusion, I pen down saying that, the increasing gap between the rich and the poor people should not be ignored as it causes political and social instability in the country and effective steps like high taxes on high salary, provide more jobs should be taken to close this gap.
- Do you agree or disagree that animals should be kept in men made cells 93
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- International tourism has become a huge industry in the world. Do the problems of international travel outweigh its advantages? 84
- Some people say that parents have the most important role in a child‘s development. However, others argue that other things like television or friends have the most significant influence. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 67
- To learn a foreign language successfully you need to spend time in the country where the language is spoken. To what extent do you agree with this? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 694, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'richer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: richer
...t for big crowd, the rich people can be more richer and poor people can be more poor. Addit...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 497, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'got', 'gotten'?
Suggestion: got; gotten
... for survive. Self employment should be get by mankind. In conclusion, I pen down...
^^^
Line 4, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...jobs should be taken to close this gap.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, moreover, really, so, well, i mean, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96056338028 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73016316628 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50985915493 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3597421824 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5652173913 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4347826087 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5652173913 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266874049566 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070647794176 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863590197635 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162314117935 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0893544077676 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.