genetic engineering is a damage trend. it should be limited . to what extent do you agree?
Over the last decades there were contradictions among different segments about genetic engineering. Obviously, right now scientists are capable to manipulate genes to produce a final product which can be both harmful or gainful for human beings and an issue to be evaluated is whether the benefits of gene engineering are worth the costs or not.
Firstly, it has been proved that there are tremendous amounts of general engineering products that can help in various number of methods, for example it can be used to produce anti allergic fruits and vegetables which prevents several allergic reactions in some group of people. It might also be helpful to include some genes in these vegetables to enforce them to grow these vitamins.
On the other hand there are large number of criticism about genetic engineering. Most of these critics claim that these manipulated fruits and vegetables are producing poisons that affect human body during a long period. Also there are some ongoing arguments that these genetic engineered fruits have little nutrition value.
In my opinion, the benefits of genetic engineering can outweigh the drawbacks, based on number of proved benefits while there are hypothesis about their harms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ammu helen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | pospelovatb | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | lily2002 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | yetim119 | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | BlackDelta | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...affect human body during a long period. Also there are some ongoing arguments that t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hypotheses', 'hypothesises'?
Suggestion: hypotheses; hypothesises
...mber of proved benefits while there are hypothesis about their harms.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, while, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 1615.20841683 64% => OK
No of words: 195.0 315.596192385 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30256410256 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6444637815 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 176.041082164 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 506.74238477 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2338579812 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.25 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126612546638 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575854476104 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308524483278 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0797051202316 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225938652199 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.