Giving lectures in auditorium to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To whta extend do you agree or disagree.
It is argued that delivering lectures in halls to a huge group of students is outdated, instead class should be taken exclusively on internet. I totally disagree with this statement as according to my perspective, student - teacher interaction is crucial to achieve higher scores and ensure accurate learning.
Learning is an act which requires active participation of student as well as teacher. Studying online is considered to be convenient method of learning; however, it is better to attend real lectures rather than virtual. If the students will attend lectures in school, they can ask any queries in the end. This will clear their doubts and help them to perform better in exams. Moreover, teachers would be aware of the attendence which means they will know how many students are absent from the class. But keeping this record is impossible in online teaching.
Motivation is another attribute that is necessary for learning and this can only be received in real lectures. While studying with fellow students, one can be motivated to study harder by seeing others. In addition, teachers also give certain examples of some successful personalities that inspire the students. Although attending lectures in auditorium can foster the learning process, it can also instill other skills like discipline and etiquettes to the students. For example, in schools, pupil learn good behaviour , punctuality, and team work etcetera.
In conclusion, it is important to attend lectures because they have overwhelming advantages. According to me, online lectures are only helpful for gaining knowledge while doing job as employed people have little time to attend physical lectures. Thus, online classes will be feasible for them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-15 | parwintalwin14 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Buithilanphuong | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Adithya999 | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | Diem Hang 1612 | 84 | view |
- Giving lectures in auditorium to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To whta extend do you agree or disagree. 73
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think they should be banned. do you agree or disagree? 73
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed , while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both and give your opinion. 61
- some people think that a high salary is important when choosing a company to work for, while others think that a good working atmosphere is more important. discuss both views and give own opinion. 78
- In most countries, multinational companies products are becoming more and more important. This trend is seriously damaging our quality of life.Do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., in schools, pupil learn good behaviour , punctuality, and team work etcetera. ...
^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...ause they have overwhelming advantages. According to me, online lectures are only helpful for g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41697416974 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78915059724 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638376383764 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6644067272 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.75 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151721944797 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499820791707 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0227447873548 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924020547097 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00850378174156 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.