Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. Do you agree or disagree?

Online learning is a matter of controversy in modern education. It is generally thought that teaching in lecture halls to numerous pupils becomes an obsolete method, and more and more people tend to be the advocate of using completely technological control in the learning process. My belief is that the technology-driven sessions play a more paramount role in comparison with the traditional way.

I hold a belief that studying on the Internet takes advantage of state-of-the-art technology hence the accessibility would be fulfilled for a wide range of learners. It is clear that there is an increasing demand for education by various status even students living away from school, having family responsibility or having restricted mobility. Thus, online learning is regarded as a measure satisfying virtually those requirements as long as the students have an available Internet connection in any convenient location.

Another important reason why I believe the Internet-enabled study is distinguished is that learners can have a valuable opportunity to gain knowledge and self-improvement from elaborations given by a lot of automatic error correction programs. For instance, “Turnitin” is well known as a plagiarism-prevention service and feedback tool in which should the paper’s student submits, it will be analyzed by comparison with a plenty of online documents, calculated grade summary for users. Due to that, pupils are able to have an overview of their assignment and make progress in learning.

Whereas, live classroom lectures require the mount of equipment investment such as classroom and office furniture, which might make tuition fees increasing and impose a financial burden on the students. Furthermore, crowded halls tend to impede the learning process because of noise and interference made by other students. Thus, it is convinced that the traditional way becomes outdated teaching method.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that online learning should supersede the traditional teaching method in near future.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-15 parwintalwin14 73 view
2019-07-15 Buithilanphuong 84 view
2019-07-15 Adithya999 56 view
2019-05-07 Diem Hang 1612 84 view
Essays by user Buithilanphuong :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...comparison with the traditional way. I hold a belief that studying on the Int...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...connection in any convenient location. Another important reason why I be...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnment and make progress in learning. Whereas, live classroom lectures r...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y becomes outdated teaching method. In conclusion, I strongly believe that o...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, so, thus, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68284789644 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45986629712 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611650485437 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7087606191 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.076923077 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147799298936 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046372940138 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352510097214 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0726616330668 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037070200459 0.056905535591 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.